[Event] 必学的潜意识暗示法 · 教你打开孩子的心扉

孩子总是叛逆、不听话？坏习惯一摞摞？焦虑不安等情绪问题大爆发？甚至还会有着重重防卫、让人难以靠近？

从“心”出发，善用潜意识暗示法即可在短时间内改善孩子的潜意识状态。只需学习简单的潜意识暗示语，便可一步到位地调整孩子的品性，甚至让亲子关系更密切。本心灵工作坊将以针对孩童问题的潜意识暗示法为主调，教导家长或老师如何运用语言来打开上述孩子的心扉，倾听和了解他们的内心，并且与他们建构心与心的温暖连接，各类心灵与行径问题将会迎刃而解。

日期：2018年8月4日（六）
时间：2pm ~ 5pm
费用：一人RM190，两人同行RM350
讲座媒介语：华语
地点：
Werkz Ground,
A-02-09, Block A, Sunway Geo Avenue,
Jalan Lagoon Selatan, Bandar Sunway,
47500 Selangor


适合人群：成人（尤其是家长、特教老师、普通老师、辅导员、身心灵工作者、有兴趣了解儿童心理的人士。）
-孩子面对情绪问题
-孩子面对学习问题
-欲改善孩子的态度
-欲调节孩子的品性
-欲增进与孩子之间的感情

主讲人简介：
古健荣又名Hiro Koo，北大博士生（主攻临床催眠与表达艺术治疗），拥有临床心理学硕士、心理学学士、英国临床催眠疗法与脑科学脑波反馈疗法学术资格，目前为一名注册执业的临床催眠师与心理治疗师。他的临床治疗职涯中紧密与自然疗法医师，中西医专才进行跨领域临床治疗与研究；所囊括的身心灵治疗法结合现代科技，在安全与无药物的基础下进行疗愈。

报名方式： Whatsapp 016-7154419 | pm www.facebook.com/newmindcentre/ 
*位置有限，有兴趣者欢迎及早联系报名

Brainwaves Analysis - A peak into your subconscious mind

Brainwaves Analysis 检测服务包括：

EEG biofeedback (Brain entrainment) is a safe, painless and non-invasive training method to improve your brain function. Brainwaves analysis method is a tool that designed to give the client’s subconscious mind a voice and allows the Hypnotherapist to reveal the various underlying factors that shape the client’s cognitive abilities, emotional responses, and automatic behavior.

• 脑波自律神经检测 EEG biofeedback and ANS analysis for autonomic dysfunction (dysautonomia)
• 注意力持久度检测 Brainwaves assessment for focus, concentrate, and pay attention
• 脑执行功能检测 Brainwaves assessment for executive functioning
• 脑压力与焦虑指数检测 Brainwaves assessment for stress and anxiety

How should I prepare for the assessment 检测事前准备? 

1. 维持干爽的头发Make sure your hair is clean, freshly washed, and free from any styling products. 
2. 避开咖啡因You may eat regular meals, but avoid drinks that contain caffeine (coffee, tea or coke) for at least 5 hours before the test. 
3. 避免事前小睡Do not nap before the test. 

Mind Fitness Training (Non-drug approach) 身心健康训练服务包括 （非药物保健咨询）：

• 个人化自我催眠教学Tailored self-hypnosis training for various issues
• 自律神经放松教学 Tailored self-hypnosis training for the autonomic nervous system (the ANS)
• 生活教练/人生导师 Life coaching 
• 脑波反馈训练/脑电波心身回馈治疗 EEG biofeedback training for better brain function
• 团体身心健康催眠 Group hypnotherapy for mental health issues

Disclaimer: Brain Entrainment method (EEG biofeedback/Neurofeedback) is not a diagnosis tool or a cure for any diagnosed conditions. It works by resolving the underlying imbalances and brain dysregulation. It is clearer viewed as personal training rather than a treatment.

First neural evidence for the unconscious thought process

Hemingway (1964/2010) describes a process that people who engage in creative pursuits from time to time recognize. While you are engaged in one thing—say a conversation with friends—consciously, something that you had been working on beforehand is still simmering unconsciously. At times the simmering is quite vigorous, and the repeating conscious intrusions can make it difficult to fully concentrate on your current activity—talking to your friends.

The idea of that incubation or unconscious thought can aid creativity or problem solving is old (Schopenhauer, 1851), and 10 years ago, we started to link the process of unconsious thought to decision making in a series of experiments (Dijksterhuis, 2004; Dijksterhuis and Nordgren, 2006;Dijksterhuis et al., 2006). The idea was based on two considerations. The first was that it is quite a small step from problem solving to decision making and the second was that the process of unconscious thought as described in the first paragraph can often be sensed, introspectively, when one is in the process of making an important decision such as buying a house or choosing between one’s job and a job offer for a new one.

In our initial experiments, we gave participants the task to choose between four alternatives (houses, cars, roommates, etc.) on the basis of a number of aspects (often 12 per alternative). Participants either decided immediately after reading the decision information, or after a period of conscious thought, or after a period of distraction during which unconscious thought was assumed to take place. In our early experiments, unconscious thinkers made better decisions than participants in the other two conditions. We initially called this the deliberation without attention effect; however, now we prefer the term unconscious thought effect (UTE).

These initial findings led a number of colleagues to also investigate the relation between unconscious thought and decision making and, looking back now at 10 years of unconscious thought research, the research seems to have revolved around two questions. The first is whether unconscious thought indeed leads to better decisions that conscious thought or no thought, the second is whether unconscious thought really exists in the first place (and if so, what exactly is it)? The contribution by Creswell et al. (2013) constitutes a major step towards answering the second question, so I focus briefly on the first before devoting the remainder of this introduction to the second and to the work by Creswellet al.

Does unconscious thought lead to better decisions? As such things tend to go, 10 years of research has led to a rather predictable answer: Probably, but only under some circumstances. The paradigm we developed turned out to be much more fragile than we had hoped, and although the UTE has been replicated independently in well over dozen laboratories, at least equally often people did not obtain any evidence for improved decision making after unconscious thought. Some individual papers, as well as a recent meta-analysis (Strick et al., 2011), identified a number of moderators. It seems that unconsious thought is beneficial when decisions are based on a lot rather than on little information, when the decision information is presented blocked by decision alternative rather than completely randomized, when the distraction task is not too cognitively taxing, and when the decision information contains visual stimuli in addition to verbal stimuli. It is encouranging for proponents of the work on unconscious thought that unconscious thoughts seem to be more fruitful when the experimental set-up becomes more ecologically valid.

That being said, some people have argued that unconscious thought does not really exist in the first place. People may make better decisions after being distracted, but that does not yet mean that any decision related mental activity took place while they were distracted. Some have proposed, for instance, that participants in unconscious thought conditions form an impression of the decision alternatives online—that is, while they read the decision information—and later simply retrieve this information. These participants may perform better than conscious thinkers, because under some circumstances, conscious thought can actually hamper decision making. Although it is indeed very likely that a reasonable proportion of participants in some unconscious thought experiments indeed merely retrieved online impression (which, by the way, can be prevented by presenting the stimulus materials rapidly), this cannot explain why unconscious thinkers also often outperform immediate decision makers (Strick et al., 2010), something that has been curiously overlooked when this alternative explanation was first published. However, there is also evidence that people who are not given the goal to make a decision before they are distracted make worse decisions than people who do have the goal (Bos et al., 2008), and this rules out this alternative explanation even more effectively. Unconscious thought is a goal-directed unconscious process, and merely distracting people does not do anything.

The experiment by Creswell et al.—in which they provide the first neural evidence for the UTE—also provides strong evidence for the unconscious thought process. They indeed found that unconscious thinkers made better decisions than conscious thinkers and than immediate decision makers. More importantly, they compared neural activity among people who were thinking unconsciously while they were engaged in a distraction task with the neural activity of people doing this same distraction task without engaging in unconscious thought. They found evidence forreactivation. The same regions that were active while people encoded the decision information—the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and left intermediate visual cortex—were active during unconscious thought. Moreover, the degree of neural reactivation differed between participants and was predictive of the quality of the decision after unconscious thought.

This is a breakthrough in unconscious thought research, and, quite appropriately in a celebratory sort of way, published almost exactly 10 years after the first experiments with the unconscious thought paradigm. Again, Creswell et al. provide the first neural evidence, and thereby—in my view at least—unambiguous evidence for the unconscious thought process. Finally, they also provide insight into the characteristics of the unconscious thought process.

Althought some aspects of the unconscious thought process can be carefully deduced from moderators, direct process-oriented evidence is scarce. Unconscious thought leads the representations of the decision alternatives in memory to become better organized and more polarized (Dijksterhuis, 2004; Bos et al., 2011) and interestingly, a recent paper shows that unconscious thinkers rely more on gist memory than on verbatim memory (Abadie et al., in press) thereby also integrating fuzzy-trace theory (e.g. Reyna and Brainerd, 1995) and unconscious thought theory. The reactivation account by Creswell et al. is fully in line with these earier findings, as earlier work on reactivation has repeatedly found (for references see the article by Creswell et al.) that reactivation improves memory and learning processes.

The work by Creswell and colleagues constitues a vital step forwards. The combined evidence now suggests that unconscious thought is a goal-directed process of neural reactivation during which memory representations of—in this case decision alternatives—change.

• © The Author (2013). Published by Oxford University Press. For Permissions, please email: [email protected]

Source: http://scan.oxfordjournals.org/content/8/8/845.full

Don't limit yourself!

Freedom is waiting for you! 

Don't limit yourself!

You're not a pet bird.

Nothing can stop you when you have determination.

All human beings have the right to make choices.

You can be what you wanna be and you take responsibility for your actions.

Imagine a future moment,

All your dreams come true!

Yes, you know this is the greatest moment of your life!

Doesn't that sound exciting?

The key to success is your subconscious mind.

How the "Clinical Hypnotherapy: Stop Smoking" works?

Do you know that your subconscious mind picks up keywords rather than entire phrases? 
So Phrases should be positive always! 

Take a look at this paragraph below. Can you read what it says? All the letters have been jumbled (mixed). Only the first and last letter of each word is in the right place:

I cnduo't bvleiee taht I culod aulaclty uesdtannrd waht I was rdnaieg. Unisg the icndeblire pweor of the hmuan mnid, aocdcrnig to rseecrah at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it dseno't mttaer in waht oderr the lterets in a wrod are, the olny irpoamtnt tihng is taht the frsit and lsat ltteer be in the rhgit pclae. The rset can be a taotl mses and you can sitll raed it whoutit a pboerlm. Tihs is bucseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey ltteer by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe. Aaznmig, huh? Yaeh and I awlyas tghhuot slelinpg was ipmorantt! See if yuor fdreins can raed tihs too.

AMAZING RIGHT? Your subconscious mind power is an incredible gift! It works for 24hrs per day! 

How the "Clinical Hypnotherapy: Stop Smoking" works? 
When you first had that cigarette it did not taste or feel so pleasant did it?
NO! it may have tasted awful and made you feel light headed? This is your sub-conscious telling you the smoke that is entering your blood stream are not good. But then you want to become a smoker. So you keep having a cigarette now and again. But then eventually these mindful warning signs start to go away because you have essentially told your sub-conscious mind that it is ok to smoke. So by now your sub-conscious mind has decided you are a smoker.

If you consciously decide to become a none smoker, your sub-conscious will disagree. Your sub-conscious always has the deciding factor over your conscious decisions.

Make it simple for you to understand:
IF YOU CONSCIOUSLY DECIDE TO DO SOMETHING (such as STOP SMOKING) YOUR SUB-CONSCIOUS WILL ONLY LET YOU IF IT AGREES.
CLINICAL HYPNOTHERAPY MAKES YOUR SUB-CONSCIOUS WANT TO STOP SMOKING NOWwww!